Kieron Monks, CNN
CNN)The rancorous reign of the 45th US President faces a fresh controversy.
A Nigerian economic and social rights group [SERAP]  has written to
the White House demanding the return of $500 million of stolen funds,
which it claims are being held by the US.
“(We urge) the administration to attach and release to Nigeria some
$500 million worth of US-based proceeds of corruption traced to former
Nigerian dictator General Sani Abacha,” the Socio-Economic Rights and
Accountability Project (SERAP) wrote in an open letter.
The letter cites US obligations as a signatory to the UN Convention
Against Corruption, and demands that the government “promptly initiate
civil asset forfeiture proceedings” to ensure that the funds are
swiftly returned to Nigeria.

General Sani Abacha was a notorious dictator who led Nigeria for five
years after taking power in a 1993 coup. He is alleged to have stolen
over $4 billion during his reign, before his death in 1998.
SERAP’s claim is the latest in a series of attempts to recover lost
wealth from Abacha and his family, which has been frozen in accounts
and assets around the world.
Switzerland has recovered and returned around $700 million to Nigeria
to date, with further sums pending. The US Department of Justice had
already seized $480 million in 2014, prior to SERAP’s new claim,
although this has yet to be returned

General Sani Abacha seized power in a 1993 coup and reigned for five years.
The Nigerian government’s focus is on reclaiming the funds it is due
from these latter cases rather than the SERAP claim, says Professor
Bolaji Owasanoye, Executive Secretary of the Presidential Advisory
Committee Against Corruption.
Extracting the money from the US in particular has been a frustrating
process for Nigeria.
“President Obama met with our President Buhari and made a commitment
to return this sum to the government of Nigeria,” says Owasanoye.
“This has been subject to legal challenge, and the bureaucratic system
in the US is hindering the return so far.”
“Developed countries are very happy to recover money but very slow to
return it,” he adds.
The legal challenge comes from Godson Nnaka, a former attorney for the
Nigerian government.
The US Department of Justice (DoJ) says that the appeal must be
resolved before the funds can be returned to Nigeria.

The Nigerian government will face further obstacles before recovering the money.
Some of the forfeited $480 million is located in banks outside the US,
which will require an even more laborious process to recover.
“The US has to get court orders for those countries to physically move
cash back to the US to go in the pot of seized assets,” says Alexander
W. Sierck, a Washington-based lawyer who has represented SERAP
pro-bono for several years in their efforts to recover Abacha funds.
“It is a lawyer’s feast that that generates a lot of work — but it is
a slow process.”
A further complication is the DoJ’s determination to avoid allowing
repatriated funds to be lost to corruption a second time, often
seeking safeguards.
In the landmark case of Equatorial Guinea, a haul of assets worth $30
million seized from the ruling Obiang family including property and
sports cars was repatriated in the form of charitable trusts, partly
overseen by the US. A similar deal was reached over proceeds of
corruption from Kazakhstan.

Teodorin Nguema Obiang, Vice-President of Equatorial Guinea, agreed to
a deal that allowed proceeds of corruption from the country to be
repatriated through a trust partly overseen by the US.
The US Congress has discussed a bill that would see the Nigerian funds
placed in a charity to support the victims of Boko Haram, but Nigeria
is unlikely to accept such an arrangement.
“The US should not impose conditions,” says Owasanoye. “They can
monitor to the use of the funds — we are transparent — but we are a
sovereign state and the money should be returned to us.
The need is particularly acute as Nigeria struggles through a period
of recession, he adds, claiming the money will be used for a range of
social welfare projects.
The World Bank estimated in 2007 that developing countries lose up to
$40 billion a year through corruption, and little is successfully
reclaimed.
“What is being recovered is a fraction of a fraction,” says Emile van
der Does de Willebois, the Bank’s global lead for financial market
integrity and asset recovery. “Legal procedures take time and an
enormous amount of resources.”
“Of any number of corruption cases you can only focus on one or
two…(and) it is up to prosecutorial authorities to make a judgement
on what is the most important case.”
The process is further complicated by problems with mutual legal
assistance and co-ordination, says de Willebois, as “victim” states
often lack expertise in how to deal with financial centers such as
Switzerland and the US.
But there has been progress, he adds, such as through a legal maneuver
that allowed Switzerland to reclaim Abacha assets by classifying his
family as a criminal organization, thus lowering the burden of proof
required for seizure.

New initiatives such as the US Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative,
and European Union-led efforts to establish transparency in offshore
holdings, also aid recovery efforts.
But asset recovery experts also say that the attitude of the new US
administration will be critical for further progress on the issue, and
the Nigerians await their answer from the White House with no little
anxiety.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.